By Wojtek Kolan - April 19, 2025
Iatcenko is scheduled to play Hruncakova on Sunday at 09:00 AM CET, in the W35 Sharm ElSheikh, Final.
Form
W L W W W L W W W W
Form
W W W L L W W W W WBased on the implied probability from the moneyline, Hruncakova has a 56.71% chance to get the victory.
PLEASE NOTE: Subscribe to the Matchstat.com tennis predictions club to reveal implied and our expert predictions to discover value bets in order to win big.
| Prediction | Chance To Win |
|---|---|
| Viktoria Hruncakova | 56.71 % |
| Polina Iatcenko | 50.74 % |
|
Above is implied from odds. Login now to reveal our expert picks. |
They've played a total of 3 sets, with Iatcenko winning 1 and Hruncakova 2. In their latest encounter at the W50 Murska Sobota on March 28, 2024, on an indoor hard court, Hruncakova triumphed with a score of 3-6, 6-2, 7-6(2). Will Iatcenko be able to even the score in their next match?
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Polina Iatcenko | 0 |
| Viktoria Hruncakova | 1 |
| Iatcenko | Stats | Hruncakova |
|---|---|---|
| 74% (14-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 70% (16-7) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 420 | Ranking | 261 |
| 295 | Highest Rank | 43 |
| 21 | Age | 26 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 17 |
| 65% (143-77) | Career Total W/L | 63% (409-244) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $1,078,936 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
20 Apr 2025 / Final
Viktoria Hruncakova implied favourite from odds → 56.71%
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-2 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Polina Iatcenko
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
13
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
101)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 14 | Games Won | 16 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 13 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:20:0 | Average Match Time | 2:20:0 |
| 62% (63/101) | 1st Serve % | 56% (50/89) |
| 70% (44/63) | 1st Serve Win % | 84% (42/50) |
| 39% (15/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (17/39) |
| 43% (3/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 27% (3/11) |
| 34% (30/89) | Return Points Win % | 42% (42/101) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
W35 Sharm ElSheikh
Hard| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Total Matches | 4 |
| 1:30:08 | Last Match | 2:18:30 |
| 5:03:38 | Total Time | 7:45:26 |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.37 |
| 8 | Aces Total | 18 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 15 |
| 68% (134/196) | 1st Serve % | 65% (179/276) |
| 69% (93/134) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (134/179) |
| 44% (27/62) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (46/97) |
| 79% (22/28) | Total Break Points Won % | 37% (13/35) |
| 61% (11/18) | Total Break Points Saved | 56% (10/18) |
| 78% (25/32) | Service Hold (%) | 84% (41/49) |
| 31% (10/32) | Opponent Hold % | 73% (36/49) |
| 63% (108/171) | Return Points Win % | 41% (140/338) |
| 62% (228/367) | Total Points Won | 52% (320/614) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreak Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 0.00 | Tiebreaks Per Match | 0.25 |
| 100% (4/4) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (3/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
When examining second serve performance over the past six months, Iatcenko has secured 38.59% of points on their second serve, while Hruncakova has claimed 42.07%. A deeper analysis of return game statistics indicates that Iatcenko has been more effective in recent form, winning 48.96% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Hruncakova's 45.98%. The first serve return statistics for the same period reveal Iatcenko's superior performance, achieving 32.75% compared to Hruncakova’s 26.48%, providing insights into who might be favored.
Under pressure, Hruncakova demonstrates a stronger ability to save breakpoints, with a rate of 55.14% as opposed to Iatcenko's 40.13%. This is a notable statistic, especially for those interested in in-game betting strategies. Iatcenko's overall match win rate over the last year stands at 61.82% with a W/L record of 34/21, whereas Hruncakova has achieved a slightly lower win rate of 56.34%, with a W/L record of 40/31.
Regarding surface performance, Iatcenko shows a preference for hard courts, boasting a career win rate of 67% (W/L 117/58), while performing less favorably on clay with 56% (W/L 9/7). Comparatively, Hruncakova also thrives on hard courts, achieving a 65% win rate (W/L 192/104), but her grass court performance lags at 49% (W/L 17/18).
Analyzing the player level, both Iatcenko and Hruncakova have predominantly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K over the last year, with Iatcenko winning 61.82% and Hruncakova closely trailing with 61.29%. This context is crucial when comparing their stats for predicting match outcomes.
In head-to-head encounters, Hruncakova holds the advantage, having won their only previous match. The match, which took place at the W 50 Murska Sobota on March 28, 2024, saw Hruncakova triumph in three sets: 3-6, 6-2, 7-6(2). This pattern continues within deciding sets and tiebreaks, where Hruncakova has been more successful, claiming victories in their solitary deciding set and tiebreak.
Over the past year, Iatcenko has faced opponents with an average ranking of 412.42, while Hruncakova's adversaries have averaged at 350.14, indicative of Hruncakova competing against slightly higher-ranked opponents. In recent form, both players display similar efficiency in converting breakpoints, with Hruncakova slightly leading at 35.87% compared to Iatcenko's 34.42%.
Considering these comprehensive performance metrics, Hruncakova appears to have a statistical edge over Iatcenko. Based on their prior head-to-head results, superior under-pressure play, and marginally better competition history, Hruncakova is predicted to emerge victorious in their upcoming match.
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Polina Iatcenko
Player
Haruka Kaji
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
83%
(
39 of
47)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Polina Iatcenko
Player
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
50
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Polina Iatcenko
Player
Valentini Grammatikopoulou
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
52%
(
27 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Polina Iatcenko
Player
Jia-Jing Lu
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dayeon Back
Player
Polina Iatcenko
79%
(
55 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
77
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Polina Iatcenko
Player
Mayuka Aikawa
72%
(
69 of
96)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
96
Total Points Won
76
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Polina Iatcenko
Player
Amandine Hesse
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Polina Iatcenko
Player
Alisa Kummel
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
13 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
51
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Polina Iatcenko
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Polina Iatcenko
Player
Mei Yamaguchi
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
8
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Carol Young Suh Lee
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
3
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
2
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
95)
85
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Anastasia Gasanova
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
64 of
90)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Amelia Rajecki
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Kamilla Bartone
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
4
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
87)
77
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
105%
(
60 of
57)
11
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Haruka Kaji
Player
Viktoria Hruncakova
69%
(
63 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
85
Total Points Won
78
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Viktoria Hruncakova
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
75)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Dalila Spiteri
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
55
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Julie Pastikova
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Samira De Stefano
57%
(
56 of
99)
1st Serve %
64%
(
74 of
116)
10
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
4
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
37%
(
16 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
44%
(
44 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
56 of
116)
111
Total Points Won
104
|
7-5 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Iatcenko Vs Hruncakova is now available here.
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67% (117/58) | Win/Loss | 65% (192/104) |
| 65% (248/133) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (409/264) |
| 58% (1917/1405) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (3371/2889) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.37 |
| 269 | Aces Total | 1134 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.35 |
| 413 | Total Double Faults | 1071 |
| 1:29:5 | Average Match Time | 1:20:48 |
| 446.18 | Average Opponent Rank | 416.17 |
| 62% (6067/9820) | 1st Serve % | 57% (9788/17211) |
| 62% (3791/6067) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (6734/9788) |
| 46% (1735/3753) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (3371/7423) |
| 53% (786/1471) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (941/2060) |
| 50% (5018/9946) | Return Points Win % | 44% (7655/17533) |
| 67% (115/171) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (190/293) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 54% (13/24) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (41/66) |
| 60% (21/35) | Deciding Set Win % | 68% (55/81) |
| 91% (122/111) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (180/164) |
| 9% (122/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (180/16) |
| 15% (53/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (116/27) |
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
